Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Contrib ncview #728

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Sep 23, 2015
Merged

Contrib ncview #728

merged 6 commits into from Sep 23, 2015

Conversation

tloizou
Copy link
Contributor

@tloizou tloizou commented Feb 28, 2014

Contributing ncview, a visual browser for netCDF format files.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 28, 2014

Jenkins: ok to test

@tloizou
Copy link
Contributor Author

tloizou commented Apr 29, 2014

@boegel I don't know why it didn't pass the test...it works fine on our cluster...

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 14, 2015

Jenkins: test this please

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4309/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 14, 2015

@wpoely86: please review

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4327/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4331/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: v2.4.0, merge sprint 2.0 Sep 16, 2015
@wpoely86
Copy link
Member

looks ready to merge.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 21, 2015

@wpoely86: if you use lgtm or LGTM or style review OK, this PR will get an extra +1 in users.ugent.be/~kehoste/easybuild-easyconfigs_pr_overview.html (when I update it)

to get a full 3/3 perfect score, the PR needs to pass the tests (ok here), needs an OK w.r.t. style, and needs a working test report

@wpoely86
Copy link
Member

lgtm

sanity_check_paths = {
'files': ['bin/ncview'],
'dirs': [],
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tloizou: missing moduleclass here

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 0 out of 0 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c9788e5c711d7a22a53d for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/77d03bcc6b3232a3e363 for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/4427/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 23, 2015

going in, thanks @tloizou!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2015
@boegel boegel merged commit a847cbd into easybuilders:develop Sep 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants