Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 27, 2022. It is now read-only.

Feature request: linked/chained completion mode #299

Closed
gegoune opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 13 comments
Closed

Feature request: linked/chained completion mode #299

gegoune opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 13 comments
Labels
difficulty:high discussion enhancement New feature or request new-feature wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@gegoune
Copy link
Contributor

gegoune commented Mar 29, 2021

mucomplete supports something they call 'extended completion', basically it helps quickly complete sequences of words by looking for word past one just matched.

It is separate mode which requires calling another completion method.

Please look at "Extending completion" example in https://github.com/lifepillar/vim-mucomplete to see exactly what I mean.

It was very nice to have when I was using mucomplete, I could see that being part of buffer source and definitely would use it daily. What do you think @hrsh7th?

@hrsh7th
Copy link
Owner

hrsh7th commented Mar 29, 2021

Interesting.....!!!

Hmm... mucomplete uses vim's native completion features. it does not fit the compe's approach...

But I think it is very nice feature! I will consider it. And feel free to post your idea!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 29, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 29, 2021
@gegoune
Copy link
Contributor Author

gegoune commented May 29, 2021

Still relevant and pretty desired feature.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 29, 2021
@lourenci
Copy link

This is the only thing I miss in nvim-compe. Please, consider to add it. :) Thanks

@Shougo
Copy link

Shougo commented Jul 29, 2021

The feature is discussed in #120.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 27, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Sep 27, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 4, 2021
@gegoune
Copy link
Contributor Author

gegoune commented Oct 27, 2021

@hrsh7th Do you think you could maybe move this issue to nvim-cmp? Would you consider it as part of amp-buffer source or even separate source? Would love to have that. :)

@Shougo
Copy link

Shougo commented Oct 27, 2021

You can request it in nvim-cmp issues.

@gegoune
Copy link
Contributor Author

gegoune commented Oct 28, 2021

Absolutely, it's just that this issue already has some context added to it and moving it over would preserve it.

@Shougo
Copy link

Shougo commented Oct 28, 2021

I have read the feature.
It seems accept current completion and fire the next auto completion.

It is not for sources feature.

@Shougo
Copy link

Shougo commented Oct 28, 2021

And the issue title seems confusing.
The title is for chained completion but you have described extended completion.
They are different features.

@gegoune
Copy link
Contributor Author

gegoune commented Oct 28, 2021

Apologies of it wasn't clearly reported. Not sure why it's called exactly.

Do you think this is something that has to be provided by nvim-cmp's core or could be done as a source?

@Shougo
Copy link

Shougo commented Oct 28, 2021

It can be provided by nvim-cmp's core.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
difficulty:high discussion enhancement New feature or request new-feature wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants