You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, 400.jpeg could be compressed from 120kb to about 50kb, nearly 60% smaller, without noticeable quality loss. It could save some bandwidth both for https://http.cat and for people who reference those cute cat images.
Take a look at: https://tinypng.com/ , they are good at compressing images, and have an API for that. Their API is free for the first 500 images in a month, it's quite enough for https://http.cat I think.
If you are interested, I can open a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @ushuz. If you wish you can open a PR. But the API suggestion won't work, http.cat serves around 1 Million images a month, and also does not have any kind of "back-end" except for Nginx.
@rogeriopvl Sorry, my mention about API is a little bit misleading. What I really meant is that with their API and 500 quota, compressing all 51 cat images can be easily done.
I opened a pull request #3 , images are now ~50% smaller on average.
For example,
400.jpeg
could be compressed from 120kb to about 50kb, nearly 60% smaller, without noticeable quality loss. It could save some bandwidth both for https://http.cat and for people who reference those cute cat images.Take a look at: https://tinypng.com/ , they are good at compressing images, and have an API for that. Their API is free for the first 500 images in a month, it's quite enough for https://http.cat I think.
If you are interested, I can open a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: