Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reword transport integrity to avoid overstatement of properties #1940

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Reword transport integrity to avoid overstatement of properties #1940

LPardue opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
digest-headers

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Contributor

LPardue commented Feb 7, 2022 

the transport layer to protect HTTP fields from modification.

Separately, this could be read to imply that a TCP checksum is sufficient. I'm not enthusiastic about that, but...ok.

Originally posted by @martinthomson in #1919 (comment)

In reply, I said

we were kind of trying to lump TCP and TLS (transport layer security) together here. Maybe we can rephrase things
@LPardue LPardue mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2022
Merged
@ioggstream
Copy link
Contributor

This has been slightly modified by #1972 ... TLS can't probably be normative, but people already knows...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
digest-headers
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ioggstream @LPardue