Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC Editor Comment #2004

Closed
mnot opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

RFC Editor Comment #2004

mnot opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Mar 16, 2022

We see a few instances of sourcecode set to type="example" or type="drawing". Please note that these two types are not listed as options on https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt. Would you like to request that they be added to the list of usable sourcecode types, or would one of the existing types be more appropriate? Please advise.

@LPardue
Copy link
Contributor

LPardue commented Mar 27, 2022

All instances are either frame types or H2-style example. This is similar to, quicwg/base-drafts#4948 (comment) so I think we should borrow that approach and use `ascii-art instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants