You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
a) The following terms were used inconsistently in this document. We chose to use the latter forms. Please let us know any objections.
Priority Parameter (1 instance in text) /
priority parameter (33 instances in text)
push ID (1 instance in text) /
Push ID (3 instances in text) (per the rest of this cluster of
documents)
stream ID (3 instances in text) / Stream ID (5 instances in text)
(also per more common usage in the rest of this cluster of
documents)
the priority field value (Section 6) /
the Priority Field Value (Section 7)
true (1 instance in text) / true (4 instances in text)
false (2 instances) / false (0 instances, but updated to match true)
b) The following terms are used inconsistently. Please let us know how we may update these. We would prefer that the RFC number not be used as an adjective, but we can see how it is descriptive in this case. Perhaps we could define a shorter term to use throughout the document in Section 2?
Terminology:
a) The following terms were used inconsistently in this document. We chose to use the latter forms. Please let us know any objections.
Priority Parameter (1 instance in text) /
priority parameter (33 instances in text)
push ID (1 instance in text) /
Push ID (3 instances in text) (per the rest of this cluster of
documents)
stream ID (3 instances in text) / Stream ID (5 instances in text)
(also per more common usage in the rest of this cluster of
documents)
the priority field value (Section 6) /
the Priority Field Value (Section 7)
true (1 instance in text) /
true (4 instances in text)
false (2 instances) /
false (0 instances, but updated to match true)
b) The following terms are used inconsistently. Please let us know how we may update these. We would prefer that the RFC number not be used as an adjective, but we can see how it is descriptive in this case. Perhaps we could define a shorter term to use throughout the document in Section 2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: