You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The layout and semantics of the frame payload are identical to those of the HTTP/2 frame defined in [ORIGIN]. The ORIGIN frame type is 0xc (decimal 12), as in HTTP/2.
I think this is the text as it was, before we ran HTTP/3 and HTTP/2 through the process. I think there's some room for editorial improvements to avoid the guesswork. Not least because HTTP/2 Origin has an errata on the payload definition (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc8336).
My suggestion is to just admit defeat and define the whole frame like we do in HTTP/3 or ext priorities, something like
Then we can say something like the semantics of the HTTP/3 ORIGIN frame payload are the same as those of the HTTP/2 ORIGIN frame, modulo the differences already described (control streams and whatnot).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In draft 00 it says:
I think this is the text as it was, before we ran HTTP/3 and HTTP/2 through the process. I think there's some room for editorial improvements to avoid the guesswork. Not least because HTTP/2 Origin has an errata on the payload definition (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc8336).
My suggestion is to just admit defeat and define the whole frame like we do in HTTP/3 or ext priorities, something like
Then we can say something like the semantics of the HTTP/3 ORIGIN frame payload are the same as those of the HTTP/2 ORIGIN frame, modulo the differences already described (control streams and whatnot).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: