Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Field registry update #2356

Closed
mnot opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Field registry update #2356

mnot opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jan 3, 2023

Currently retrofit updates the HTTP field name registry to add a SF column. Should that happen in the bis document instead?

Doing it there seems more logical to me, although it may be editorially awkward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant