We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently retrofit updates the HTTP field name registry to add a SF column. Should that happen in the bis document instead?
Doing it there seems more logical to me, although it may be editorially awkward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
b90e32a
No branches or pull requests
Currently retrofit updates the HTTP field name registry to add a SF column. Should that happen in the bis document instead?
Doing it there seems more logical to me, although it may be editorially awkward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: