Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CRM associations #59

Open
ThirstyJarek opened this issue Nov 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

CRM associations #59

ThirstyJarek opened this issue Nov 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
api-contract-compliance Discussion is focused on helping the client library meet the API contracts enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ThirstyJarek
Copy link

Just wondering if there's any future plans for the implementation of the CRM associations? Looking into linking a company as a child to another company.

Cheers
@Psypher9
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your question @ThirstyJarek! We are certainly trying to get to full API coverage, however this feature may not be released for a while! If you'd be up for helping us with that it would surely be appreciated.

@Psypher9 Psypher9 added api-contract-compliance Discussion is focused on helping the client library meet the API contracts enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 19, 2019
@facgiglio
Copy link

Hi everyone, I made some modifications to the library to include some CRM associations. It's not fully develop, but if you want i cant uploaded to see.
Contact me!!

Regards

@Psypher9
Copy link
Member

@facgiglio go ahead and make a PR and we will take a look at it!

@jbeacham
Copy link

@facgiglio Any update here??

@hakimio hakimio mentioned this issue Feb 14, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
api-contract-compliance Discussion is focused on helping the client library meet the API contracts enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@facgiglio @jbeacham @Psypher9 @ThirstyJarek