Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document Afterburner Translation #865

Open
7 of 17 tasks
mikelittle opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
7 of 17 tasks

Document Afterburner Translation #865

mikelittle opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@mikelittle
Labels
bug Existing functionality isn't behaving as expected should have Should be done, medium priority for now

Comments

@mikelittle
Copy link
Contributor

The Afterburner page in the documentation does not mention the translation feature.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The documentation mentions the translation feature of Afterburner

For Altis Team Use

Ready for Work Checklist

Is this ticket ready to be worked on? See
the Play Book Definition of Ready

  • Is the title clear?
  • Is the description clear and detailed enough?
  • Are acceptance criteria listed?
  • Have any dependencies been identified? (Optional)
  • Have any documentation/playbook changes been identified? (Optional)
  • Is an estimate or time box assigned?
  • Is a priority label assigned?
  • Is this ticket added to an epic? (Optional)

Completion Checklist

Is this ticket done? See
the Play Book Definition of Done

  • Has the acceptance criteria been met?
  • Is the documentation updated (including README)?
  • Do any code/documentation changes meet project standards?
  • Are automatic tests in place to verify the fix or new functionality?
  • Or are manual tests documented (at least on this ticket)?
  • Are any Playbook/Handbook pages updated?
  • Has a new module release (patch/minor) been created/scheduled?
  • Have the appropriate backport labels been added to the PR?
@mikelittle mikelittle added bug Existing functionality isn't behaving as expected should have Should be done, medium priority for now labels Mar 29, 2024
@mikelittle mikelittle self-assigned this Mar 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mikelittle mikelittle

Labels
bug Existing functionality isn't behaving as expected should have Should be done, medium priority for now
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mikelittle