Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For metabo and set-of-runs example needs a PSI-MS CV terms (instead of QC CV #182

Open
mwalzer opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #219
Open

For metabo and set-of-runs example needs a PSI-MS CV terms (instead of QC CV #182

mwalzer opened this issue Mar 24, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #219
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@mwalzer
Copy link
Collaborator

mwalzer commented Mar 24, 2022

We need a PCA analysis result term for set-of runs (and if possible metabo) example
Currently used in set-of-runs are:

    QC:4000264 ! group of runs
    QC:4000267 ! PCA table

and in metabo

    QC:4000254 ! Peak area feature PCA result
    QC:4000255 ! Batch corrected peak area feature PCA result

What properties should the term(s) have to be broadly machine-intelligible?

@mwalzer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mwalzer commented Mar 24, 2022

Both examples use table columns for a PCA dimension and some input reference (run-names / labels).
Ready-to-plot would be a nice bonus (labels as in group/color/condition).

@mwalzer mwalzer added this to the v1.0RC1 milestone Mar 25, 2022
@mwalzer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mwalzer commented May 10, 2022

HUPO-PSI/psi-ms-CV#127 to fix

@bittremieux bittremieux linked a pull request Mar 20, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants