add comment about openssl dependency #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ah I see now why we use it. It is because ursa does not have a vendored openssl feature open. I will add a comment explaining and reuse this PR for that. |
berendsliedrecht
force-pushed
the
remove-openssl
branch
from
d183b5d
to
eac95c1
Compare
Signed-off-by: blu3beri <blu3beri@proton.me>
berendsliedrecht
changed the title
TimoGlastra
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@andrewwhitehead I am not sure why it was a dependency, but if we have to keep it for some reason we can of course keep it in.
Signed-off-by: blu3beri berend@animo.id