[FAB-13199] Reduce etcdraft test time.

Change-Id: Idc65a77259ae7a153aa4d077f9e72d1e2961ab46
Signed-off-by: Jay Guo <guojiannan1101@gmail.com>

orderer/consensus/etcdraft/chain_test.go

@@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Chain", func() {
 					Eventually(c4.support.WriteBlockCallCount, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
 
 					// node 1 has been stopped should not write any block
-					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(1))
+					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(1))
 
 					network.connect(1)
 
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Chain", func() {
 					Eventually(c2.support.WriteBlockCallCount, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
 					Eventually(c3.support.WriteBlockCallCount, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
 					// node 1 has been removed from replica set should not be getting any blocks
-					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(1))
+					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(1))
 				})
 
 				It("removes leader from replica set", func() {
@@ -1729,17 +1729,17 @@ var _ = Describe("Chain", func() {
 					Eventually(c2.support.WriteBlockCallCount, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
 					Eventually(c3.support.WriteBlockCallCount, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
 					// node 1 has been stopped should not write any block
-					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(1))
+					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(1))
 
 					By("trying to submit to new node, expected to fail")
 					c1.cutter.CutNext = true
 					err = c1.Order(env, 0)
 					Expect(err).To(HaveOccurred())
 
 					// number of block writes should remain the same
-					Consistently(c2.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
-					Consistently(c3.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(2))
-					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount, defaultTimeout).Should(Equal(1))
+					Consistently(c2.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(2))
+					Consistently(c3.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(2))
+					Consistently(c1.support.WriteBlockCallCount).Should(Equal(1))
 				})
 			})
 		})
@@ -2502,7 +2502,7 @@ func (n *network) start(ids ...uint64) {
 				_, err := n.chains[id].storage.Entries(1, 1, 1)
 				return err
 			}).ShouldNot(HaveOccurred())
-
+			Eventually(n.chains[id].WaitReady).ShouldNot(HaveOccurred())
 			wg.Done()
 		}(i)
 	}
@@ -2564,7 +2564,7 @@ func (n *network) elect(id uint64) (tick int) {
 	// results in undeterministic behavior. Therefore
 	// we are going to wait for enough time after each
 	// tick so it could take effect.
-	t := 1000 * time.Millisecond
+	t := 50 * time.Millisecond
 
 	n.connLock.RLock()
 	c := n.chains[id]
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ func (n *network) elect(id uint64) (tick int) {
 				// therefore, we might observe 0 first. In this
 				// situation, no more tick is needed because an
 				// leader election is already underway.
-				Eventually(c.observe).Should(Receive(Equal(id)))
+				Eventually(c.observe, LongEventualTimeout).Should(Receive(Equal(id)))
 			} else {
 				// if there's no leader (fresh cluster), we have 0 -> Y
 				// therefore we should observe Y directly.