Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Given the capabilities of InfluxDb 2.7+, investigate wether Prometheus is still required #62

Open
pruneau628 opened this issue Apr 11, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pruneau628
Copy link

This is a follow-up issue to 61.

61 was raised, because using a metric as a tag in prometheus (or even influxdb) is a anti-pattern.

However, it questions the pertinence of using prometheus, because prometheus is a numeric time series data store, which cannot leverage the textual data provided by indy-node-monitor.
I also appeared that influxdb 2.7+ (instead of 1.8) seemed to fill the alerting void left if prometheus was removed from the solution

So we are investigating fully or partly replacing elements of the current (as of 2023-04-11) stack by the latest OSS version of influxdb (currently 2.7.0)

For memory, here is the current architecture:

flowchart TD
    Grafana[/Grafana\n* data display\n* dashboards\] -- queries --> Prometheus
    Grafana -- queries --> InfluxDB
    Prometheus{{Prometheus& \nAlertManager\n* numeric time series\n* alerting}} -- queries --> Telegraf
    Telegraf[[Telegraf\n\n* periodic data gathering\n* data dispatch]] -- stores --> InfluxDB{{InfluxDB\n* numeric time series\n* text-based time series}}
    Telegraf -- queries --> 
    Indy-Node-Monitor[Indy-Node-Monitor\n* status/metrics\ngathering interface]  --> IndyClusters[\Indy Clusters/]
    Indy-Node-Monitor --> IndyClusters
    Indy-Node-Monitor --> IndyClusters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant