Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Resease a new version with updated ed25519-dalek #178

Closed
askolesov opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Resease a new version with updated ed25519-dalek #178

askolesov opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@askolesov
Copy link
Contributor

askolesov commented Apr 22, 2021

We have a dependency collision with cosmos_sdk=0.1.1 crate in our project.

error: failed to select a version for `ed25519-dalek`.
    ... required by package `tendermint v0.19.0`
    ... which is depended on by `cosmos_sdk v0.1.1`
    ... which is depended on by `libindy v1.95.0 (.../libindy)`
versions that meet the requirements `^1` are: 1.0.1, 1.0.0

all possible versions conflict with previously selected packages.

  previously selected package `ed25519-dalek v1.0.0-pre.3`
    ... which is depended on by `ursa v0.3.5`
    ... which is depended on by `libindy v1.95.0 (.../libindy)`

failed to select a version for `ed25519-dalek` which could resolve this conflict

The version of ed25519-dalek is already updated in master. Could you please publish it to crates.io?

@ryjones
Copy link
Contributor

ryjones commented May 5, 2021

Does this help? #179

@askolesov
Copy link
Contributor Author

askolesov commented May 5, 2021

Unfortunately, no(

  • The version of ed25519-dalek in the master was already compatible with the crate we use.
  • It wasn't (and isn't) published to crates.io so we can't consume it.
  • Rust can consume git repositories as dependencies but we can't use this feature either because there are two crates called lindy in the repository: one is in the root, the other one is in /libindy. Rust takes the wrong crate and there is no way to resolve this collision.

So all necessary changes are done but we can consume it neither in crates.io nor in git. Could you please publish the updated version to crates.io?

@mikelodder7
Copy link
Contributor

Published

@askolesov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants