-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License unclear #8
Comments
Hi Hugo, Thank you for your interest in packaging AJPy. I will try to clarify this ASAP. |
Hi Hugo, I changed the license header of ajpy/ajpy.py file to BSD-4 license format. Let me know if something is blocking you in the packaging process. |
Thanks ! However setup.py is still specifying |
My bad, I will change the license in the setup.py tomorrow. |
The license has been updated in setup.py and pushed to pypi. |
Thanks, I have just uploaded the package to the Debian archive. |
Hi Hugo, Thank you for the package. However, AJPy only works with python 2.7 currently. I will add the support of python 3 later. |
I just committed a fix to support python 3 (and python 2 compatible). I tested with a custom tomcat.py to make sure all code is covered. |
Thanks. python-ajpy was just accepted into unstable, and I have uploaded your fix for Python 3 support. |
Thank you Hugo for your work! |
Hi Julien,
I am about to package AJPy for Debian, but found out that the license of AJPy isn't well defined. The header in ajp.py looks like a BSD license, but since you didn't include it completely, I can't know if it's a BSD-2, 3 or 4 clause. Can you clarify this point?
Thanks for your work !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: