New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Manual archiving of tasks [2] #4060
Comments
We could add this request to issue #3430 and provide an additional archive option. |
bulk option implemented with #3430. Missing: single button when editing tasks |
…ask-archiving #4060 - Manual archiving of tasks
Verified ticket on local setup using the latest version of Sormas 1.78.0-SNAPSHOT.
|
@roxanamlendea when setting the feature configs EDIT_ARCHIVED_ENTITIES to false, archived tasks can still be edited. |
@KristinaBorch The behavior that Tasks can be edited for archived Cases/Contacts is since #8463 was implemented. See the ticket's description and @sergiupacurariu 's comment from 24 November with the implemented behavior explanations. |
@roxanamlendea The issue #8463 is mainly about read permission for S2S and not about read-only for archived entities. I think it is described in #8727 saying that tasks associated with archived entities should be read-only as well as archived tasks themselves. |
@KristinaBorch the fact that when EDIT_ARCHIVED_ENTITIES = false, archived tasks can still be edited will be fixed when ticket #8727 will be merged. |
Feature Description
We as a health department (Gesundheitsamt Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg) implemented a workflow that is completely based on Sormas.
We are using "case investigation"-tasks that are marked as done when finished.
After the investigation a supervisor double-checks the investigated case and then at the end of the shift an automated script send a letter/mail to every person that has been investigated on that day.
The view of tasks marked as "done" is becoming more cluttered by the day and we would like to remove this clutter by archiving the tasks that have been double-checked and received mail.
Removing the tasks does not work (interferes with "case investigation" status), deleting the tasks is not wanted as the tasks contain important information - most importantly, the name of the person who did the investigation.
Proposed Change
Add a functionality to manually archive tasks - analogues to the "archive" button in case view.
Acceptance Criteria
Implementation Details
Task
entity.Additional Information
Possible alternatives:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: