Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The "EmbedmentDepth" property needs a new home (StructuralPhysical?) #68

Open
diegoalexdiaz opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@diegoalexdiaz
Copy link
Contributor

The QuantityTakeoffsAspects schema contains a class that we want to deprecate: PileAspect. The only detail preventing us from deprecating it is its "EmbedmentDepth" property.

Discussions need to take place in order to decide a better home for such property (if it needs to survive as an aligned/standard property on a Discipline-Physical schema - e.g. StructuralPhysical).

@NabilSleiman
Copy link

Deprecated to be replaced by what class?

@diegoalexdiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

The StructuralPhysical already contains a "Pile" class, so it is a natural replacement for the qto:PileAspect usage. However, the latter contains a property (EmbedmentDepth) that we don't know if it should survive in the StructuralPhysical schema or not. That's the question the StructuralPhysical team needs to address.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants