Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unicode 9 support! #59

Closed
autopulated opened this issue Jul 15, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Unicode 9 support! #59

autopulated opened this issue Jul 15, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@autopulated
Copy link

Twemoji has been updated to include unicode 9 emoji – is it possible to re-build and include that data now?

@iamcal iamcal mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2016
@jhuckaby
Copy link

I totally understand the complexity of adding those new double-wide Emoji into a spritesheet, but would it be possible to just add the single-wide Emoji in Unicode 9.0? Just these here:

🤣 🤤 🤠 🤡 🤥 🤢 🤧 🤶 🤴 🤵 🤰 🤦 🤷 🕺 🤺 🤸 🤼 🤽 🤾 🤹 🤳 🤞 🤙 🤛 🤜 🤚 🤝 🖤 🦍 🦊 🦌 🦏 🦇 🦅 🦆 🦉 🦎 🦈 🦐 🦑 🦋 🥀 🥝 🥑 🥔 🥕 🥒 🥜 🥐 🥖 🥞 🥓 🥙 🥚 🥘 🥗 🥛 🥂 🥃 🥄 🛴 🛵 🛑 🛶 🥇 🥈 🥉 🥊 🥋 🥅 🥁 🛒

I personally have no need for the silly double-wide ones. I just want some of the extremely popular ones in U9.0 like 🤣 and 🤢 .

Reference:
http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-versions.html#v9.0_2016

Thanks for a wonderful library!

@Crissov
Copy link
Contributor

Crissov commented Mar 10, 2017

I think what @jhuckaby is referring to as double-wide emojis are the various kinds of emoji sequences described in UTS#51 alias Emoji X.0 (currently 4.0 and 5.0 beta), whereas single-wide emojis are code-points defined in the Unicode Standard (currently 9.0 and 10.0 beta). The former should indeed be part of a separate issue since they are harder to get right.

@iamcal
Copy link
Owner

iamcal commented Mar 11, 2017

we already support several sequences (from emoji 3.0), but not the latest. closing this in favor of #77 which is the same thing

@iamcal iamcal closed this as completed Mar 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants