-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OCP] Using the olm script manually to apply does not work in OpenShift environment (no marketplace namespace) #29
Comments
@mew2057 just for kicks.... I did the following:
But nothing happened:
Any pointers? |
So this was a documentation gap on my part. In OpenShift you don't need The Alternatively, follow this guide https://github.com/operator-framework/community-operators/blob/master/docs/testing-operators.md |
Here's the Revised documentation: Option B: Using Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM)
The following will subscribe the quay.io version of the operator assuming OLM is installed. cd ${OPERATOR_DIR}/stable/ibm-spectrum-scale-csi-operator-bundle/operators/ibm-spectrum-scale-csi-operator
kubectl apply -f deploy/olm-scripts/operator-source.yaml
|
Also, until we're in OperatorHub this documentation is actually not terribly accurate, this is just a for example. I don't know if we should actually support OLM officially until we're there, because the current model is pointing to a bundle I made by hand that isn't even up to date? |
Remove auto unmount functionality
This should have been addressed with the GA. OLM instructions here- |
Following document provide the mechanism for OLM pre release test. Please reopen if above document is not sufficient |
Describe the bug
Trying to follow this instruction:
Results in this error:
To Reproduce
In Openshift environment, run
oc apply -f deploy/olm-scripts/operator-source.yaml
Expected behavior
Operator comes up?
Environment
Running this code:
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: