Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replacement for Linq ForEach() #65

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
Meerownymous opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Replacement for Linq ForEach() #65

Meerownymous opened this issue Nov 10, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@Meerownymous
Copy link
Collaborator

Meerownymous commented Nov 10, 2017

Bug Report or Feature Request (mark with an x)

  • bug report -> please search issues before submitting
  • feature request

Expected Behavior

We have a class which accepts a IEnumerable and can execute a function for each element.

Origin: @ICACLE wanted to do: collection.ToList().ForEach(). We need a convenient and intuitive way to do it in OOP world.

Actual Behavior

Steps to reproduce the behavior

The log given by the failure.

Mention any other details that might be useful

Lets discuss fist, how it should be called or if an existing class can be extended to accomplish it.
When discussion is finished, remove the question label.

@Meerownymous
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Meerownymous commented Nov 19, 2017

We should use And, since this is what it was designed for. Lets complete the issue to split And, to make it more usable for this purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant