-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a validation suite #17
Comments
That would be where I find them, do you have some precalcualted that I can use for validation? |
There is a point on the project drive that has the validation input as well as the validation output for Seals |
We have to finalize this aspect of the project. |
I added 5 images to bridges to use for validation: |
Can you move them to a folder named validation? I think this is the same folder as the one used for experiments, right? Furthermore, I think we should find a set of unclassified images that we can use for validation. We will need to run them multiple times as we develop the ICEBERG framework. |
Ok. Moved to /pylon5/mc3bggp/bspitz/Validation |
Images that we can have in a public web server with open access. Let's say we need the space those images are occupying for another use case ( I know it sounds extreme, but this is hypothetical) and we remove them. At the same time, I make a change in the EnTK scripts because the API changed. I execute the validation suit as the last level of testing and it fails. We will probably get to an investigation of trying to find a bug that does not exist, because the input was not present. I know this is an extreme case, but I think it is going to happen at some point in the lifetime of the software. |
Yes, I see. Because of the Digital Globe licensing that does not exist. But we should be able to create synthetic data that satisfies the validation criteria and can be public. |
That would be perfect! |
Hello Brad, I pushed a |
@iparask Thank you for the restructure. The scripts are in place. We just need to run merge_shapefiles.py on the output from the validation data then test_sealnet.py to compare with the ground truths in test_shapefiles (no GPU needed). |
Alright, I'm getting there! |
May I ask what is a good
Is this expected? Is there a chance that the test shapefiles in the repo are outdated? |
@bentocg @bspitzbart can you provide me with instructions on how to run the validation scripts? Also can you update on git the |
@bentocg Are the correct validation inputs and shp files in https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UQKjGcIjeYmci0i9CpsMm5Yia1cbaOZC |
The use case requires a validation suite that allows us to run the pipelines and find out whether there are differences or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: