N-Stat sorting improvement for Type X measures (and others?)

[jhaasdyk-au]

Brief description
Sorting by N-stat appears to only consider the first triplet of a TypeX msr.
If a high N-stat value appear further down a Type X msr group, the entire Type X msr is reported too far down the sorted N-Stat list.
Feature improvement request: Consider N-stat value of all measurement components when sorting. (all measurement types).

Basic requirements
N-Stat sorting to account for all measurement components, for all measurement types.

Priority
Priority 2 (medium)] / Priority 3 (low)

[nicgowans]

Placing this example in support of the above. Note two highlighted nstats within the X-cluster msr which have absolute values larger than the max nstat of several earlier measurements.