You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is a reproduction of the archived freya#5 for SQA purposes. Please refer to that issue for any extended discussion that may exist beyond this description.
Reason
In order to fully duplicate the results in the Cincotti paper validation, a radiative heat flux boundary condition is needed. This is general enough that it could be added to the MOOSE heat conduction module. For expediency, though, putting it in Freya for now is ideal.
In GitLab by @cticenhour on Dec 14, 2021, 15:39
This issue is a reproduction of the archived freya#5 for SQA purposes. Please refer to that issue for any extended discussion that may exist beyond this description.
Reason
In order to fully duplicate the results in the Cincotti paper validation, a radiative heat flux boundary condition is needed. This is general enough that it could be added to the MOOSE heat conduction module. For expediency, though, putting it in Freya for now is ideal.
Design
The condition outlined in Cincotti et al, Figure 4 needs to be implemented.
Impact
New capability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: