Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistency check for date time pattern if using InfluxDB #330

Open
ckittl opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #331
Open

Consistency check for date time pattern if using InfluxDB #330

ckittl opened this issue Apr 16, 2021 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #331
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects

Comments

@ckittl
Copy link
Member

ckittl commented Apr 16, 2021

When querying InfluxDB, results contain a time stamp in RFC 3339 format. (cf. InfluxDB doc). However, currently, the factories being used for parsing, may rely on a different kind of format.

A similar issue arises with other sources, that might query based upon a notion of time. I would suggest to make the factories' time stamp pattern accessible from outside, so that either consistency checks are possible or one can use the factory's pattern for other purposes.

@ckittl ckittl added bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers labels Apr 16, 2021
@ckittl ckittl added this to the Version 2.0 milestone Apr 16, 2021
@ckittl ckittl added this to Needs triage in BugTracker via automation Apr 16, 2021
@ckittl ckittl linked a pull request Apr 16, 2021 that will close this issue
@sebastian-peter sebastian-peter modified the milestones: Version 3.0, Version 3.1 Jan 23, 2023
@sebastian-peter sebastian-peter modified the milestones: Version 3.1, Version 4.0 Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
BugTracker
  
Needs triage
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants