Diff between protocol specific properties and protocol properties

[zaheduzzaman]

api-drafts/draft-ietf-taps-interface.md

Lines 1945 to 1952 in c70520f

	Protocol Specific Properties are defined in a transport- and
	implementation-specific way to
	permit more specialized protocol features to be used.
	Too much reliance by an application on Protocol Specific Properties can significantly reduce the flexibility
	of a transport services implementation to make appropriate
	selection and configuration choices. Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that
	Protocol Properties are used for properties common across different protocols and that
	Protocol Specific Properties are only used where specific protocols or properties are necessary.

Are Protocol Specific Properties and Protocol Properties same or different?

Also note that we are first time defining the Protocol Properties in the interface document ( described along with Connection Properties) and not introduced in the architecture document. I think we should be clear about what we are defining where and describing where. I would suggest use of cross reference rather describing everything again and again, which might create confusion and inconsistency.

[mwelzl]

Oh, this seems like a mistake (great catch, thanks!) - "Protocol Properties" don't exist, I think we only have "protocol-specific Properties".

[zaheduzzaman]

I caught this when reading the implementation doc. So it should be fixed there as well.