Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mutual exclusivity of instance identifier #45

Closed
jricher opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Mutual exclusivity of instance identifier #45

jricher opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@jricher
Copy link
Collaborator

jricher commented Nov 13, 2020

§2.3.1 Identifying the RC Instance: Editor's note:

It seems clear that an instance identifier is mutually exclusive with most of the fields in the request (eg, we don't want an attacker being able to swap out a client's registered key just by accessing the identifier). However, some proposed concepts might fit alongside an instance identifier that change at runtime, such as device posture or another dynamic attestation. Should these be sent in the "client" block alongside the instance identifier, should there be a separate top-level block for runtime attestations, or some other mechanism?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant