You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are defining a media type here that has some limitations (mostly lack of streaming, #75). If we want to define a more capable media type, what would the system need to do to allow that to happen?
At face value, this seems simple: the oblivious request resource consumes the media type. It already needs to make its key known to clients, so adding a set of acceptable media types to that information seems entirely reasonable.
Questions:
Should we enrich the key configuration with other meta-information? Or is this supplementary information?
Is there any value in an in-band signaling mechanism? We've already seen that feedback about time is ...challenging.
Supported media types convey information that might be used to distinguish clients in the same way that key selection could. What do we need to do about ensuring consistency?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since OHTTP is meant for specific applications, this seems like something the client and server ought to know a priori, unlike the specific key configuration. I don't think we need to make any changes here.
We are defining a media type here that has some limitations (mostly lack of streaming, #75). If we want to define a more capable media type, what would the system need to do to allow that to happen?
At face value, this seems simple: the oblivious request resource consumes the media type. It already needs to make its key known to clients, so adding a set of acceptable media types to that information seems entirely reasonable.
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: