Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom model tree for the multiple IFC files #69

Closed
2 tasks done
ThatMetaverseArchitect opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Custom model tree for the multiple IFC files #69

ThatMetaverseArchitect opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature Something new that we could do tooeen

Comments

@ThatMetaverseArchitect
Copy link

ThatMetaverseArchitect commented Jun 26, 2023

Description πŸ“

2023-05-04 10_09_14_ModelTreeForTheMultipleModels

Custom model tree – to show both federated Ifc Model structure and individual Ifc model structure
Can we also have option to move the model or orient the model origin as well as the orientation of the building?

Suggested solution πŸ’‘

No response

Alternative β›•

No response

Additional context ☝️

No response

Validations βœ…

  • Read the docs.
  • Check that there isn't already an issue that requests the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.
@ThatMetaverseArchitect ThatMetaverseArchitect added the feature Something new that we could do label Jun 26, 2023
@ThatMetaverseArchitect ThatMetaverseArchitect changed the title Model_Tree_For_The_Multiple_Models custom model tree for the multiple ifc files/ modifying the model origin and the orientation Jun 26, 2023
@agviegas
Copy link
Contributor

agviegas commented Sep 22, 2023

Hey @ThatMetaverseArchitect I'm going to create a new issue for orientating the building and leave this just to make the entity tree support multiple models. I'm adding this to the roadmap system!

@agviegas agviegas changed the title custom model tree for the multiple ifc files/ modifying the model origin and the orientation Custom model tree for the multiple ifc files Sep 22, 2023
@agviegas agviegas added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@agviegas agviegas self-assigned this Sep 22, 2023
@agviegas agviegas modified the milestone: 1.2.0 Sep 22, 2023
@agviegas agviegas changed the title Custom model tree for the multiple ifc files Custom model tree for the multiple IFC files Oct 22, 2023
@agviegas
Copy link
Contributor

agviegas commented Nov 1, 2023

Hey @ThatMetaverseArchitect can you please also resend this model? Thanks!

@agviegas agviegas removed this from the 1.2.0 milestone Nov 25, 2023
@agviegas
Copy link
Contributor

FIxed! The library now provides features to code your own tree according to your needs, as well as federation tools to make sure your models are aligned.

@ThatMetaverseArchitect
Copy link
Author

@agviegas federation works... do you know how we can export the ferderated models as a MERGED IFC?

@agviegas
Copy link
Contributor

IFC merging is possible with the core library, but we haven't created any specific component for it yet. But we plan to do it, hopefully in the next milestone, so the template already has a built-in merge function. If you create a feature issue in this repo, I'll make sure to keep you posted once we do it

@ThatMetaverseArchitect
Copy link
Author

@agviegas ,

we had a look at the current template. We were not able to find or understand a built-in merge function.
Did you mean that built-in merge as a federation feature from the model tree like the image below?
image

we understood merge IFCs as one IFC model so that we can export as a merged IFC model from the app.

Once you clarify this, I will create a feature issue in this repo so that we can keep tracking on the updates.
Thanks.

@agviegas
Copy link
Contributor

agviegas commented Aug 7, 2024

Currently there's no built-in merge function to export a new merged IFC, but we can add it as a feature. Feel free to create a new feature issue and I'll take care.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Something new that we could do tooeen
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants