The MESSAGE model includes a detailed representation of energy-related and - via the link to GLOBIOM - land-use CO2 emissions (Riahi and Roehrl, 2000 riahi_greenhouse_2000; Riahi, Rubin et al., 2004 riahi_prospects_2004; Rao and Riahi, 2006 rao_role_2006; Riahi et al., 2011 riahi_rcp_2011). CO2 emission factors of fossil fuels and biomass are based on the 1996 version of the IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories ipcc_revised_1996 (see tab-emissionfactor). It is important to note that biomass is generally treated as being carbon neutral in the energy system, because the effects on the terrestrial carbon stocks are accounted for on the land use side, i.e. in GLOBIOM (see section globiom). The CO2 emission factor of biomass is, however, relevant in the application of carbon capture and storage (CCS) where the carbon content of the fuel and the capture efficiency of the applied process determine the amount of carbon captured per unit of energy.
- Fuel
- Emission factor [tC/TJ]
- Emission factor [tCO2/TJ]
- Emission factor [tC/kWyr]
- Hard coal
- 25.8
- 94.6
- 0.814
- Lignite
- 27.6
- 101.2
- 0.870
- Crude oil
- 20.0
- 73.3
- 0.631
- Light fuel oil
- 20.0
- 73.3
- 0.631
- Heavy fuel oil
- 21.1
- 77.4
- 0.665
- Methanol
- 17.4
- 63.8
- 0.549
- Natural gas
- 15.3
- 56.1
- 0.482
- Solid biomass
- 29.9
- 109.6
- 0.942
CO2 emissions of fossil fuels for the entire energy system are accounted for at the resource extraction level by applying the CO2 emission factors listed in tab-emissionfactor to the extracted fossil fuel quantities. In this economy-wide accounting, carbon emissions captured in CCS processes remove carbon from the balance equation, i.e. they contribute with a negative emission coefficient. In parallel, a sectoral acounting of CO2 emissions is performed which applies the same emission factors to fossil fuels used in individual conversion processes. In addition to conversion processes, also CO2 emissions from energy use in fossil fuel resource extraction are explicitly accounted for. A relevant feature of MESSAGE in this context is that CO2 emissions from the extraction process increase when moving from conventional to unconventional fossil fuel resources (McJeon et al., 2014 mcjeon_gas_2014).
CO2 mitigation options in the energy system include technology and fuel shifts; efficiency improvements; and CCS. A large number of specific mitigation technologies are modeled bottom-up in MESSAGE with a dynamic representation of costs and efficiencies. As mentioend above, MESSAGE also includes a detailed representation of carbon capture and sequestration from both fossil fuel and biomass combustion (see tab_CCScapturerates).
- Conversion Process
- Plant type
- Capture rate
- Electricity generation
- supercritical PC power plant with desulphurization/denox and CCS
- 90%
- Electricity generation
- IGCC power plant with CCS
- 90%
- Electricity generation
- biomass IGCC power plant with CCS
- 86%
- Liquid fuel production
- Fischer-Tropsch coal-to-liquids with CCS
- 85%
- Liquid fuel production
- coal methanol-to-gasoline with CCS
- 85%
- Liquid fuel production
- Fischer-Tropsch gas-to-liquids with CCS
- 90%
- Liquid fuel production
- Fischer-Tropsch biomass-to-liquids with CCS
- 65%
- Liquid fuel production
- Biomass to Gasoline via the Methanol-to-Gasoline (MTG) Process with CCS
- 67%
- Hydrogen production
- coal gasification with CCS
- 92%
- Hydrogen production
- biomass gasification with CCS
- 85%
- Hydrogen production
- steam methane reforming with CCS
- 90%
MESSAGE includes a representation of non-CO2 GHGs (CH4, N2O, HFCs, SF6, PFCs) mandated by the Kyoto Protocol (Rao and Riahi, 2006 rao_role_2006) with the exception of NF3. Included is a representation of emissions and mitigation options from both energy related processes as well as non-energy sources like municipal solid waste disposal and wastewater. CH4 and N2O emissions from land are taken care of by the link to GLOBIOM (see Section emission_land).
Air pollution implications are derived with the help of the GAINS (Greenhouse gas-Air pollution INteractions and Synergies) model. GAINS allows for the development of cost-effective emission control strategies to meet environmental objectives on climate, human health and ecosystem impacts until 2030 (Amann et al., 2011 amann_cost-effective_2011). These impacts are considered in a multi-pollutant context, quantifying the contributions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), ammonia (NH3), non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOC), and primary emissions of particulate matter (PM), including fine and coarse PM as well as carbonaceous particles (BC, OC). As a stand-alone model, it also tracks emissions of six greenhouse gases of the Kyoto basket with exception of NF3. The GAINS model has global coverage and holds essential information about key sources of emissions, environmental policies, and further mitigation opportunities for about 170 country-regions. The model relies on exogenous projections of energy use, industrial production, and agricultural activity for which it distinguishes all key emission sources and several hundred control measures. GAINS can develop finely resolved mid-term air pollutant emission trajectories with different levels of mitigation ambition (Cofala et al., 2007 cofala_scenarios_2007; Amann et al., 2013 amann_regional_2013). The results of such scenarios are used as input to global IAM frameworks to characterize air pollution trajectories associated with various long-term energy developments (see further for example Riahi et al., 2012 riahi_chapter_2012; Rao et al., 2013 rao_better_2013; Fricko et al., 2017 fricko_marker_2017).