You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if you choose to see common names, you'll see some taxonomic context for IDs, eg a member of Family Primulaceae (Primroses) here:
But we don't provide that if the user has chosen to see only only common names:
It's been requested that we add this info for users who choose to not see common names, at least for IDs that are fairly specific, so if an ID is below family (or maybe even below subfamily?), can we display the family that contains that taxon, but not include its common name? So for the example above, it would read
a member of Family Primulaceae
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From: https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/maintain-taxonomic-info-for-identifications-when-common-names-are-hidden/15453
Currently, if you choose to see common names, you'll see some taxonomic context for IDs, eg
a member of Family Primulaceae (Primroses)
here:But we don't provide that if the user has chosen to see only only common names:
It's been requested that we add this info for users who choose to not see common names, at least for IDs that are fairly specific, so if an ID is below family (or maybe even below subfamily?), can we display the family that contains that taxon, but not include its common name? So for the example above, it would read
a member of Family Primulaceae
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: