Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data draft: Consider additional verbiage about node-id uniqueness #101

Open
brockners opened this issue Feb 27, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@brockners
Copy link
Collaborator

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/v4a75IXTi8GKfDl_Ddm_5WN6gxs

"While, for example, the
IOAM node identifier (Node-ID) does not have to be unique in a
deployment , the combination of Node-ID and Namespace-ID will
always be unique.
"
Why assume that the node id will not be unique? It is only to increase complexity.The uniqueness should be guaranteed which is common in other protocols design such as LSR ID in MPLS signalling, Router ID in IGP, etc.

@brockners
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Addressed in #119

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant