Wrong wrapper for isl_ast_op_type_print_macro

[thisiscam]

I noticed that the ISL function isl_ast_op_type_print_macro got parsed into the wrong class:
https://documen.tician.de/islpy/ref_ast.html?highlight=op_type_print_macro#islpy.AstExpr.op_type_print_macro.

I'm leaving an issue here since I'm not sure what's the best approach to fix it.

[inducer]

Hack this logic:

islpy/gen_wrap.py

Lines 636 to 648 in a5c7df5

	if class_name is not None:
	name = name[len(class_name)+1:]
	else:
	if name.startswith("bool_"):
	return
	if name.startswith("options_"):
	class_name = "ctx"
	name = name[len("options_"):]
	elif name.startswith("equality_") or name.startswith("inequality_"):
	class_name = "constraint"
	elif name == "ast_op_type_set_print_name":
	class_name = "printer"
	name = "ast_op_type_set_print_name"

[thisiscam]

Hmm, hacking this naively (similar to line 646) doesn't seem to work because ast_op_type is an enum, and the argument order is reversed compared to ast_op_type_set_print_name .