You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a user of the current dam break demo, I have the need to show investors that it is possible to seamlessly change the underlying simulator without changing anything else on my code, except the simulator parameter. This is a major selling point of the API because it allows us to show we are not stuck to a specific provider of simulation (and so we are not in a fragile business position that we depend on a single point to expose a certain functionality). I need to be able to show we can do this:
sim_output=scenario.simulate()
which runs with some default simulator (and which the user doesn't have to select but we will inform the user via a status message), but also:
the feedback messages should show that we are running with these options, and the output should be syntactically the same so that the rest of the code does not change.
This is an urgent feature since it allows us to show a very important aspect of the API
Note: I would like this to be implemented by Luis+Begaiym with only distant supervision from Fabio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hpenedones
changed the title
I want to be able to swap between SplishSplash and DualSPH for the dam break scenario
swap between SplishSplash and DualSPH for the dam break scenario
Feb 28, 2023
hpenedones
changed the title
swap between SplishSplash and DualSPH for the dam break scenario
SplishSplash and DualSPH for the dam break scenario
Feb 28, 2023
As a user of the current dam break demo, I have the need to show investors that it is possible to seamlessly change the underlying simulator without changing anything else on my code, except the simulator parameter. This is a major selling point of the API because it allows us to show we are not stuck to a specific provider of simulation (and so we are not in a fragile business position that we depend on a single point to expose a certain functionality). I need to be able to show we can do this:
which runs with some default simulator (and which the user doesn't have to select but we will inform the user via a status message), but also:
or
the feedback messages should show that we are running with these options, and the output should be syntactically the same so that the rest of the code does not change.
This is an urgent feature since it allows us to show a very important aspect of the API
Note: I would like this to be implemented by Luis+Begaiym with only distant supervision from Fabio.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: