Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintroduce generic artifacts #61

Closed
3 tasks
Tracked by #65
andrey-kuprianov opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks
Tracked by #65

Reintroduce generic artifacts #61

andrey-kuprianov opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New (user-facing) feature or request

Comments

@andrey-kuprianov
Copy link
Contributor

We've had an initial attempt of introducing artifacts, which have then been deleted in favor of a simpler approach.

Artifacts are meant as a generic representation of (intermediate) stages of processing; each should come with the clean description of the format, and with the ability to (de-)serialise to/from files or strings in a generic way.

Current artifacts include:

  • TLA file
  • Cfg file
  • TLA trace
  • JSON trace

Currently, e.g. TLA and Cfg files are represented as references to filesystem paths, which makes it really hard to operate them independently of that. Instead each artifact should know only it's content, no matter where it comes from, and be able to show/save it upon request. This will make it transparent to integrate into the modules, and further into the CLI.

What to do:

@andrey-kuprianov andrey-kuprianov added the enhancement New (user-facing) feature or request label Aug 19, 2021
@andrey-kuprianov andrey-kuprianov added this to the v0.3.0 Factory milestone Aug 19, 2021
@andrey-kuprianov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed via #70 and #80

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New (user-facing) feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants