Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
44 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | ||
## Minutes for Wednesday, Sept 28 | ||
|
||
**Attendees:** | ||
|
||
* Hao Xiao - Runtime Verification | ||
* Joris Dral - Well-Typed | ||
* Las Safin - MLabs | ||
* Mikael Björn - FYEO | ||
* Vilhelm Sjöberg - Certik | ||
* Simon Thompson - IOG | ||
* Stefano Leone - IOG | ||
* Bogdan Manole - IOG | ||
* Adriana Saez - IOG | ||
|
||
**Apologies** | ||
|
||
* Mathieu Montin - Tweag | ||
* Nicolas Jeannerod - Tweag | ||
* Jonathon Bartlett - Tweag | ||
* Thomas Arts - Quviq | ||
|
||
### Minutes: | ||
|
||
* Minutes from Sep, 21 were signed-off. | ||
* Chair: Mikael Björn from FYEO | ||
* Vice-Chair: Hao Xiao - Runtime Verification | ||
* CIP-57 “Plutus Smart-Contract Blueprints” - It was asked if the proposed information under this CIP would be a value for the auditors groups. | ||
* Initial view is that this would not be of much use. Every single person uses different tools | ||
* However it could useful to talk about the design of protocols from a more abstract perspective | ||
* It was agreed to start a discussion under the Cardano certification alliance Github for all the members to share their view. | ||
* Final conclusion on this topic to be agreed by next week | ||
* All the information re: “Agda formalization of the ledger” is public in the formal ledger specifications repo for everybody to see. Link https://github.com/input-output-hk/formal-ledger-specifications. It was agreed that a demo on this will be useful. | ||
* It was asked if this group could be involved in defining the certification standard for Cardano wallets | ||
* There are mixed views from the members so action has been taken to review this topic and confirm the answer by the next meeting. | ||
|
||
**Actions:** | ||
|
||
* All members from the working group: Share with Simon how many companies have been audited by EOW | ||
* All members from the working group: Bring any comment re the initial charter to the next meeting, with the aim of signing it off at the next meeting. | ||
* **Las** - Start a discussion under the Cardano certification alliance Github on CIP-57 “Plutus Smart-Contract Blueprints” **All members to share their view** . Link to Github https://github.com/input-output-hk/Cardano-certification-alliance-working-group | ||
* **Simon** - Organize a demo on “Agda formalization of the ledger” in the coming weeks | ||
* **Simon** - To share key points on brainstorming session on design of metadata for describing DApps, and particularly, on certification metadata. | ||
* **All members from the working group**: Share views if defining the certification standard for Cardano wallets should be part of this group | ||
* **Adriana/ Simon** - aim try to clarify what defining the certification standard for Cardano wallets means. Is the purpose to set-up some sort of standard for the future wallets that want to be Cardano certified or existing wallets? |