Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Added WarmValency to local root configuration
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Refactor Governor established belowTargetLocal job

Refactor progress to established target test
  • Loading branch information
bolt12 committed May 29, 2023
1 parent fe1479b commit 913d184
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 13 changed files with 292 additions and 162 deletions.
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion ouroboros-network/src/Ouroboros/Network/Diffusion/P2P.hs
Expand Up @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.Governor.Types
TracePeerSelection (..), emptyPublicPeerSelectionState)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LedgerPeers
(UseLedgerAfter (..), withLedgerPeers)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers (HotValency,
WarmValency)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.PeerMetric (PeerMetrics)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.PeerSharing (PeerSharing)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.PeerStateActions
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -220,7 +222,8 @@ data ArgumentsExtra m = ArgumentsExtra {
--
daPeerSelectionTargets :: PeerSelectionTargets

, daReadLocalRootPeers :: STM m [(Int, Map RelayAccessPoint PeerAdvertise)]
, daReadLocalRootPeers :: STM m [( (HotValency, WarmValency)
, Map RelayAccessPoint PeerAdvertise)]
, daReadPublicRootPeers :: STM m (Map RelayAccessPoint PeerAdvertise)
-- | Peer's own PeerSharing value.
--
Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.EstablishedPeers as Established
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.Governor.Types
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.KnownPeers (setTepidFlag)
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.KnownPeers as KnownPeers
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers
(HotValency (..))
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers as LocalRootPeers


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,10 +83,10 @@ belowTargetLocal actions
Set.\\ inProgressDemoteWarm
numPromoteInProgress = Set.size inProgressPromoteWarm
, not (Set.null availableToPromote)
, (target, members, membersActive) <- groupsBelowTarget
, (HotValency hotTarget, members, membersActive) <- groupsBelowTarget
, let membersAvailableToPromote = Set.intersection
members availableToPromote
numMembersToPromote = target
numMembersToPromote = hotTarget
- Set.size membersActive
- numPromoteInProgress
, not (Set.null membersAvailableToPromote)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -135,10 +137,10 @@ belowTargetLocal actions
= GuardedSkip Nothing
where
groupsBelowTarget =
[ (target, members, membersActive)
| (target, members) <- LocalRootPeers.toGroupSets localRootPeers
[ (hotValency, members, membersActive)
| ((hotValency, _), members) <- LocalRootPeers.toGroupSets localRootPeers
, let membersActive = members `Set.intersection` activePeers
, Set.size membersActive < target
, Set.size membersActive < getHotValency hotValency
]

belowTargetOther :: forall peeraddr peerconn m.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -357,10 +359,10 @@ aboveTargetLocal actions
}
-- Are there any groups of local peers that are below target?
| let groupsAboveTarget =
[ (target, members, membersActive)
| (target, members) <- LocalRootPeers.toGroupSets localRootPeers
[ (hotValency, members, membersActive)
| ((hotValency, _), members) <- LocalRootPeers.toGroupSets localRootPeers
, let membersActive = members `Set.intersection` activePeers
, Set.size membersActive > target
, Set.size membersActive > getHotValency hotValency
]
, not (null groupsAboveTarget)
-- We need this detailed check because it is not enough to check we are
Expand All @@ -376,11 +378,11 @@ aboveTargetLocal actions
Set.\\ inProgressDemoteHot
numDemoteInProgress = Set.size inProgressDemoteHot
, not (Set.null availableToDemote)
, (target, members, membersActive) <- groupsAboveTarget
, (HotValency hotTarget, members, membersActive) <- groupsAboveTarget
, let membersAvailableToDemote = Set.intersection
members availableToDemote
numMembersToDemote = Set.size membersActive
- target
- hotTarget
- numDemoteInProgress
, not (Set.null membersAvailableToDemote)
, numMembersToDemote > 0
Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ import System.Random (randomR)
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.EstablishedPeers as EstablishedPeers
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.Governor.Types
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.KnownPeers as KnownPeers
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers
(WarmValency (..))
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers as LocalRootPeers


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -59,8 +61,8 @@ belowTarget :: forall peeraddr peerconn m.
belowTarget = belowTargetLocal <> belowTargetOther


-- | For locally configured root peers we have the (implicit) target that they
-- should all be warm peers all the time.
-- | For locally configured root peers we have the explicit target that comes from local
-- configuration.
--
belowTargetLocal :: forall peeraddr peerconn m.
(MonadSTM m, Ord peeraddr)
Expand All @@ -74,49 +76,48 @@ belowTargetLocal actions
localRootPeers,
knownPeers,
establishedPeers,
inProgressDemoteWarm,
inProgressPromoteCold
}

-- Are we below the target for number of /local/ root peers that are
-- established? Our target for established local root peers is all of them!
-- However we still don't want to go over the number of established peers
-- or we'll end up in a cycle.
| numLocalEstablishedPeers + numLocalConnectInProgress
< targetNumberOfLocalPeers

-- Are there any /local/ root peers that are cold we could possibly pick to
-- connect to? We can subtract the local established ones because by
-- definition they are not cold and our invariant is that they are always
-- in the connect set. We can also subtract the in progress ones since they
-- are also already in the connect set and we cannot pick them again.
, numLocalAvailableToConnect - numLocalEstablishedPeers
- numLocalConnectInProgress > 0
--TODO: switch style to checking if the set is empty
-- Are there any groups of local peers that are below target?
| not (null groupsBelowTarget)
-- We need this detailed check because it is not enough to check we are
-- below an aggregate target. We can be above target for some groups
-- and below for others.

-- Are there any groups where we can pick members to promote?
, let groupsAvailableToPromote =
[ (numMembersToPromote, membersAvailableToPromote)
| let availableToPromote =
localAvailableToConnect
Set.\\ localEstablishedPeers
Set.\\ localConnectInProgress
Set.\\ localDemoteInProgress
, not (Set.null availableToPromote)
, (WarmValency warmTarget, members, membersLocalEstablished) <- groupsBelowTarget
, let membersAvailableToPromote = Set.intersection members availableToPromote
numMembersToPromote = warmTarget
- Set.size membersLocalEstablished
- numLocalConnectInProgress
, not (Set.null membersAvailableToPromote)
, numMembersToPromote > 0
]
, not (null groupsAvailableToPromote)
= Guarded Nothing $ do
-- The availableToPromote here is non-empty due to the second guard.
-- The known peers map restricted to the connect set is the same size as
-- the connect set (because it is a subset). The establishedPeers is a
-- subset of the connect set and we also know that there is no overlap
-- between inProgressPromoteCold and establishedPeers. QED.
--
-- The numPeersToPromote is positive based on the first guard.
--
let availableToPromote :: Set peeraddr
availableToPromote = localAvailableToConnect
Set.\\ localEstablishedPeers
Set.\\ localConnectInProgress
selectedToPromote <-
Set.unions <$> sequence
[ pickPeers st
policyPickColdPeersToPromote
membersAvailableToPromote
numMembersToPromote
| (numMembersToPromote,
membersAvailableToPromote) <- groupsAvailableToPromote ]

numPeersToPromote = targetNumberOfLocalPeers
- numLocalEstablishedPeers
- numLocalConnectInProgress
selectedToPromote <- pickPeers st
policyPickColdPeersToPromote
availableToPromote
numPeersToPromote
return $ \_now -> Decision {
decisionTrace = [TracePromoteColdLocalPeers
targetNumberOfLocalPeers
numLocalEstablishedPeers
[ (target, Set.size membersEstablished)
| (target, _, membersEstablished) <- groupsBelowTarget ]
selectedToPromote],
decisionState = st {
inProgressPromoteCold = inProgressPromoteCold
Expand All @@ -126,28 +127,35 @@ belowTargetLocal actions
| peer <- Set.toList selectedToPromote ]
}

-- If we could connect to a local root peer except that there are no local
-- root peers currently available then we return the next wakeup time (if any)
-- TODO: Note that this may wake up too soon, since it considers non-local
-- known peers too for the purpose of the wakeup time.
| numLocalEstablishedPeers + numLocalConnectInProgress < targetNumberOfLocalPeers
-- If we could promote except that there are no peers currently available
-- then we return the next wakeup time (if any)
| not (null groupsBelowTarget)
, let potentialToPromote =
-- These are local peers that are cold but not ready.
LocalRootPeers.keysSet localRootPeers
Set.\\ localEstablishedPeers
Set.\\ KnownPeers.availableToConnect knownPeers
, not (Set.null potentialToPromote)
= GuardedSkip (Min <$> KnownPeers.minConnectTime knownPeers)

| otherwise
= GuardedSkip Nothing
where
localRootPeersSet = LocalRootPeers.keysSet localRootPeers
targetNumberOfLocalPeers = LocalRootPeers.size localRootPeers
groupsBelowTarget =
[ (warmValency, members, membersEstablished)
| ((_, warmValency), members) <- LocalRootPeers.toGroupSets localRootPeers
, let membersEstablished = members `Set.intersection` EstablishedPeers.toSet establishedPeers
, Set.size membersEstablished < getWarmValency warmValency
]

localRootPeersSet = LocalRootPeers.keysSet localRootPeers
localEstablishedPeers = EstablishedPeers.toSet establishedPeers
`Set.intersection` localRootPeersSet
localAvailableToConnect = KnownPeers.availableToConnect knownPeers
`Set.intersection` localRootPeersSet
localConnectInProgress = inProgressPromoteCold
`Set.intersection` localRootPeersSet

numLocalEstablishedPeers = Set.size localEstablishedPeers
numLocalAvailableToConnect = Set.size localAvailableToConnect
localDemoteInProgress = inProgressDemoteWarm
`Set.intersection` localRootPeersSet
numLocalConnectInProgress = Set.size localConnectInProgress


Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.EstablishedPeers as Established
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.KnownPeers (KnownPeers)
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.KnownPeers as KnownPeers
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LedgerPeers (IsLedgerPeer)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers (LocalRootPeers)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers (HotValency,
LocalRootPeers, WarmValency)
import qualified Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.LocalRootPeers as LocalRootPeers
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.PeerAdvertise (PeerAdvertise)
import Ouroboros.Network.PeerSelection.PeerSharing (PeerSharing)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -202,7 +203,8 @@ data PeerSelectionActions peeraddr peerconn m = PeerSelectionActions {
-- It is structured as a collection of (non-overlapping) groups of peers
-- where we are supposed to select n from each group.
--
readLocalRootPeers :: STM m [(Int, Map peeraddr PeerAdvertise)],
readLocalRootPeers :: STM m [( (HotValency, WarmValency)
, Map peeraddr PeerAdvertise)],

-- | Read the current Peer Sharing willingness value
--
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ data PeerSelectionCounters = PeerSelectionCounters {
coldPeers :: Int,
warmPeers :: Int,
hotPeers :: Int,
localRoots :: [(Int, Int)]
localRoots :: [((HotValency, WarmValency), Int)]
} deriving (Eq, Show)

peerStateToCounters :: Ord peeraddr => PeerSelectionState peeraddr peerconn -> PeerSelectionCounters
Expand All @@ -393,7 +395,7 @@ peerStateToCounters st = PeerSelectionCounters { coldPeers, warmPeers, hotPeers,
]

emptyPeerSelectionState :: StdGen
-> [(Int, Int)]
-> [((HotValency, WarmValency), Int)]
-> PeerSelectionState peeraddr peerconn
emptyPeerSelectionState rng localRoots =
PeerSelectionState {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -659,8 +661,7 @@ data TracePeerSelection peeraddr =
-- | target established, actual established, selected peers
| TracePromoteColdPeers Int Int (Set peeraddr)
-- | target local established, actual local established, selected peers
| TracePromoteColdLocalPeers Int Int (Set peeraddr)
-- | target established, actual established, peer, delay until next
| TracePromoteColdLocalPeers [(WarmValency, Int)] (Set peeraddr)
-- promotion, reason
| TracePromoteColdFailed Int Int peeraddr DiffTime SomeException
-- | target established, actual established, peer
Expand All @@ -669,8 +670,9 @@ data TracePeerSelection peeraddr =
| TracePromoteWarmPeers Int Int (Set peeraddr)
-- | Promote local peers to warm
| TracePromoteWarmLocalPeers
[(Int, Int)] -- ^ local per-group `(target active, actual active)`,
-- only limited to groups which are below their target.
[(HotValency, Int)]
-- ^ local per-group `(target active, actual active)`,
-- only limited to groups which are below their target.
(Set peeraddr) -- ^ selected peers
-- | target active, actual active, peer, reason
| TracePromoteWarmFailed Int Int peeraddr SomeException
Expand All @@ -690,7 +692,7 @@ data TracePeerSelection peeraddr =
-- | target active, actual active, selected peers
| TraceDemoteHotPeers Int Int (Set peeraddr)
-- | local per-group (target active, actual active), selected peers
| TraceDemoteLocalHotPeers [(Int, Int)] (Set peeraddr)
| TraceDemoteLocalHotPeers [(HotValency, Int)] (Set peeraddr)
-- | target active, actual active, peer, reason
| TraceDemoteHotFailed Int Int peeraddr SomeException
-- | target active, actual active, peer
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 913d184

Please sign in to comment.