Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set TCP_NODELAY for sockets #2069

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 12, 2020
Merged

Set TCP_NODELAY for sockets #2069

merged 1 commit into from May 12, 2020

Conversation

karknu
Copy link
Contributor

@karknu karknu commented May 12, 2020

During normal operation we send two small messages shortly after one
another (chainsync's RequestNext and blockfetch's RequestRange) when we
learn of a new block.
Without this option we would wait for an ACK of RequestNext before we
sent RequestRange.

During normal operation we send two small messages shortly after one
another (chainsync's RequestNext and blockfetch's RequestRange) when we
learn of a new block.
Without this option we would wait for an ACK of RequestNext before we
sent RequestRange.
@karknu karknu requested review from coot and njd42 May 12, 2020 11:23
@karknu
Copy link
Contributor Author

karknu commented May 12, 2020

bors r+

@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented May 12, 2020

@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot merged commit 7c57f50 into master May 12, 2020
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the karknu/nodelay branch May 12, 2020 11:45
coot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2022
2069: Set TCP_NODELAY for sockets r=karknu a=karknu

During normal operation we send two small messages shortly after one
another (chainsync's RequestNext and blockfetch's RequestRange) when we
learn of a new block.
Without this option we would wait for an ACK of RequestNext before we
sent RequestRange.

Co-authored-by: Karl Knutsson <karl.knutsson@iohk.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants