New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Empty levels missing when reference column is set #323
Comments
So this is interesting. The code is very old (and, I think, not hit very often), but looking now at what is in there, this was at one point intentional. I think that its ok to remove this. That already happened in the no reference-group case, from the looks of it. In both cases, teh columns are degenerate, but having a reference group doesn't make that more wrong in any way that i can think of. Note, however, that this is technically a user-facing behavior change, rather than a bugfix. I'll bring it up in the meeting tomorrow and go ahead and make the change provided there's no pushback. |
@gmbecker how did the meeting go? can you make the change? |
Yes we will be making the change and it will be in the CRAN release that will be going out in the next couple days. |
Hi @gmbecker, I think it is an issue with
VarLevWBaselineSplit
, i.e.And
results in
and
results in
Can you please check that the level with no observation does not get dropped when setting the
ref_group
?Originally posted by @waddella in #322 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: