Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"46 times faster" Link in Readme is broken #106

Closed
Clashsoft opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

"46 times faster" Link in Readme is broken #106

Clashsoft opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Clashsoft
Copy link

This does not exist anymore: https://gist.github.com/substack/2790507#gistcomment-3099862

Please update the link, or provide a comparison in the Readme directly without a link indirection.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Oct 20, 2023

Here's the content: https://web.archive.org/web/20211006063112/https://gist.github.com/substack/2790507

However, due to #76, and the fact that performance isn't that important compared to correctness, which this package provides for universal code, I'll rework that section of the readme instead.

@ljharb ljharb closed this as completed in b78de76 Oct 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants