The encoding test should be reviewed

[heidivanparys]

There are two issues with the encoding test:

• Encoding should allow gmx:Anchor too (besides gco:CharacterString): md-iop.a.3: Encoding should allow gmx:Anchor too ets-repository#127, and in general: take substitution groups into account in the XPaths

• The guidance regarding encoding is actually unclear (GML vs. the actual application schema (or both maybe?); is specification required or not): Metadata ETS: md-iop.a.3 Encoding should not require specification ets-repository#30

[cportele]

I agree. I think that resolving the two referenced issues should also resolve this issue. The 2016.3 sub-group should discuss and decide what should be done.

[heidivanparys]

@michellutz I think this issue should have the "for-2017.4-discussion" label.

[michellutz]

Implementation of the agreed resolutions for the two issues is progressing. I therefore propose to remove the "for-2017.4-discussion" label.