Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

Is there any case to verify depthwise convolution in CLDNN? #74

Closed
math3d opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Is there any case to verify depthwise convolution in CLDNN? #74

math3d opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@math3d
Copy link

math3d commented Jul 25, 2019

Hi, I noticed that you have implemented several depthwise convolution related cl kernels(see below). But I didn't see any related case to use these kernel.

Also, you mentioned the validated topologies include ": AlexNet*, VGG(16,19), GoogleNet(v1,v2,v3), ResNet(50,101,152)* Faster R-CNN*, Squeezenet*, SSD_googlenet*, SSD_VGG*, PVANET*, PVANET_REID*, age_gender*, FCN* and yolo*.", but not include mobilenet.

So does it mean the depthwise convolution cl kernels haven't been verified yet? If not, do you have any samples to share?

depthwise convolution related cl kernels:
https://github.com/intel/clDNN/blob/master/kernel_selector/core/cl_kernels/convolution_gpu_bfyx_f16_depthwise.cl
https://github.com/intel/clDNN/blob/master/kernel_selector/core/cl_kernels/convolution_gpu_bfyx_depthwise_weights_lwg.cl
https://github.com/intel/clDNN/blob/master/kernel_selector/core/cl_kernels/convolution_gpu_byxf_af32_depthwise.cl

@math3d math3d closed this as completed Jul 25, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant