Release 0.4.1 with RxSwift extension. Resolves #2

[alexruperez]

Issue Link 🔗

#2

Goals ⚽

Create a RxSwift extension for NetClient

Implementation Details 🚧

NetTask rx extension

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9 into master will decrease coverage by 2.71%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master      #9      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    5.16%   2.45%   -2.72%     
=========================================
  Files          82     222     +140     
  Lines        7537   15870    +8333     
  Branches       72      72              
=========================================
  Hits          389     389              
- Misses       7146   15479    +8333     
  Partials        2       2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ds/RxSwift/RxSwift/Observables/Dematerialize.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
Pods/RxSwift/RxSwift/Observable.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
.../RxSwift/Schedulers/VirtualTimeConverterType.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
...ods/RxSwift/RxSwift/Traits/PrimitiveSequence.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
Pods/RxSwift/RxSwift/Observables/ElementAt.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
Pods/RxSwift/RxSwift/Observables/Sink.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
...RxSwift/RxSwift/Disposables/SerialDisposable.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
...ft/RxSwift/Schedulers/Internal/ScheduledItem.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
...Swift/RxSwift/Disposables/RefCountDisposable.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
...xSwift/RxSwift/Observables/DelaySubscription.swift	0% <0%> (ø)
... and 276 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 63c3cbf...50a89d7. Read the comment docs.

[juantrias]

Now it's time to play with it!

---

Reviewed 225 of 228 files at r1, 9 of 10 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, some commit checks failed.

---

RxSwift/NetTask+Rx.swift, line 37 at r2 (raw file):

            })
            return Disposables.create()
        }

Veo que en RxAlamofire han añadido un .startWith(RxProgress(bytesWritten: 0, totalBytes: 0)) Sería necesario aquí o el callback de self.base.progress empieza a ejecutarse nada más lanzar la petición?

---

Comments from Reviewable

[alexruperez]

@juantrias empieza solo al lanzar, confirmado. :)