Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: Implement Scheduled Events via Gateway. #799

Merged
merged 12 commits into from May 23, 2022
Merged

feat: Implement Scheduled Events via Gateway. #799

merged 12 commits into from May 23, 2022

Conversation

FayeDel
Copy link
Collaborator

@FayeDel FayeDel commented May 23, 2022

About

This pull request implements Scheduled Events via gateway/event object representation.

Checklist

  • I've ran pre-commit to format and lint the change(s) made.
  • I've checked to make sure the change(s) work on 3.8.6 and higher.
  • This fixes/solves an Issue.
    • (If existent):
  • I've made this pull request for/as: (check all that apply)
    • Documentation
    • Breaking change
    • New feature/enhancement
    • Bugfix

@FayeDel FayeDel added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels May 23, 2022
@FayeDel FayeDel self-assigned this May 23, 2022
Toricane
Toricane approved these changes May 23, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Toricane Toricane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@EdVraz EdVraz merged commit 167e005 into interactions-py:unstable May 23, 2022
@FayeDel FayeDel deleted the unstable-gw-scheduled_events branch July 30, 2022 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Toricane Toricane Toricane approved these changes

Assignees

@FayeDel FayeDel

Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@FayeDel @Toricane @EdVraz