Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] Stock locations optionally not counted in the available stock #7064

Open
1 of 2 tasks
nuffer opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

[FR] Stock locations optionally not counted in the available stock #7064

nuffer opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
api Relates to the API enhancement This is an suggested enhancement or new feature Fund This issue can be specifically funded for development stock Related to Stock models
Milestone

Comments

@nuffer
Copy link

nuffer commented Apr 18, 2024

Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.

  • I checked and didn't find a similar feature request

Problem statement

I have some parts that are allocated to RnD team in my company and that I cannot use them for production. It would be nice to have a way to not count them in the current available stock. Thus I can create PO for production according to the correct quantity.

Suggested solution

Stock location object should have a boolean field to discard them from the stock count. Then all RnD parts can be placed in this specific stock locaiton.

Describe alternatives you've considered

The current alternative consiste of putting our RnD parts with the status "Quarantined". An alternative way could come from #4289 by creating a custom "RnD" status.

Examples of other systems

No response

Do you want to develop this?

  • I want to develop this.

Upvote & Fund

  • We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
  • We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
  • Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.
Fund with Polar
@nuffer nuffer added enhancement This is an suggested enhancement or new feature triage:not-checked Item was not checked by the core team labels Apr 18, 2024
@SchrodingersGat SchrodingersGat added stock Related to Stock models api Relates to the API Fund This issue can be specifically funded for development and removed triage:not-checked Item was not checked by the core team labels Apr 18, 2024
@SchrodingersGat
Copy link
Member

@nuffer that's a pretty reasonable suggestion and should not be too difficult to implement really. Would you be willing to implement this, or perhaps fund the development if you are not able?

@SchrodingersGat SchrodingersGat added this to the 0.16.0 milestone May 13, 2024
@czkapitan2
Copy link

As on my reply in #4289 - I also discovered the need for "special" locations that would not count towards the overall store . Now we solve this by marking the item as "LOST" but this means 2 steps when moving between locations : 1st step move, 2nd step mark as LOST ....:-) I'll try to "throw" funds into polar.sh ( unfortunately it's not only up to me:-) )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api Relates to the API enhancement This is an suggested enhancement or new feature Fund This issue can be specifically funded for development stock Related to Stock models
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants