-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RAM usage is concerning #1301
Comments
Found one of the problems |
Another one |
Another #1308 |
I thought @jrouzierinverse was the one in charge of digging the memory issue :P |
Yes I am at the moment most of the things I found does not reduce memory by a lot and requires a lot of time to fix. |
Some good news on this front I was able to reduce the portal httpd process by at least 20 megabytes. Since it is one of those huge commits we should push this to 6.1 to avoid delaying the 6.0 release. |
For those who are interested the script is here. https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/feature/no_export/addons/dev-helpers/no_export.sh |
On 6.0.1 (Debian jessie) when I click |
@tribut I've opened #1452 for this matter. |
That's a never ending fight but we're back to an acceptable usage Closing |
With the latest internal reports from @fdurand I think we should spend time profiling our RAM usage before releasing v6.
There may - read is - be place for optimization
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: