You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This seems almost too obvious to me, so chances are I'm missing something but: would it be better to use a range type input rather than a text input? As well as being more logical it would also mean you could read the min, max and step options from the associated attributes.
ie. The following two would be equivalent:
<input type="text" value="10;500" data-step="5">
and
<input type="range" min="10" max="500" step="5">
Using <input type="range"> actually works already, but the attributes aren't read.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, Martin. In first builds of range slider i was using type="range" in base input field. But later i found some crossbrowser bugs in doing so. In old IE browsers. So i can't do that now, maybe few years later than i will drop IE<10 support.
This seems almost too obvious to me, so chances are I'm missing something but: would it be better to use a range type input rather than a text input? As well as being more logical it would also mean you could read the min, max and step options from the associated attributes.
ie. The following two would be equivalent:
and
Using
<input type="range">
actually works already, but the attributes aren't read.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: