Reason for remote url?

[clementop]

I'm curious about your decision for making the remote url of the repository a requirement for a git stats record.

When I read "...but locally, with all your git commits.", I imagined that the graph would be aggregating data across all of my commits (at least the repositories I have imported). Many of my repositories are just kept locally -- they are not connected to any remotes.

Is git-stats intended to only aggregate public contributions?

[IonicaBizau]

Because in the future I may add more stats, maybe listing the repositories and how active was their development in the time.

So, having a remote url is probably the best technique to namespace the repositories.

I was also thinking at something like:

{
    "config": { /* defaults */}
  , "commits": { "hash": "date" }
  , "urls": { "remote-url": ["hash1", "hash2", ... ] }
}

Maybe we will change it this way. See this related discussion too: IonicaBizau/git-stats-importer#1

[IonicaBizau]

And sure, if you have any ideas post comments here.