Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question regarding the "Circle score" #73

Closed
ko0000 opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Question regarding the "Circle score" #73

ko0000 opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@ko0000
Copy link

ko0000 commented Oct 19, 2021

Hi, I'm new to this field and trying to identify/verify the true eccDNA from my WGS data. Could you explain the "circle score" a little more? How it was calculated ? (equation?)

In the reference paper, you mentioned:
"a circular DNA mapping score, calculated by multiplying the length of the split read by its mapping probability, and summing over all the scores for the split reads supporting a circle"
,which I was not fully understand.

Many thanks!

Ko

@iprada
Copy link
Owner

iprada commented Oct 19, 2021

The whole idea is to arrive to an additive scoring scheme that takes into account the amount of reads (more better), the length of the read (ore better) and the mapping probability (higher better)

@ko0000
Copy link
Author

ko0000 commented Oct 21, 2021

The whole idea is to arrive to an additive scoring scheme that takes into account the amount of reads (more better), the length of the read (ore better) and the mapping probability (higher better)

Thank you! So you simply add the numbers together? Have you set a specific weight to any of the parameters in your equation? or given every parameter an equal weight when calculating "circle score"?

(e.g., If the "length of the reads" is more important than the other parameter when indicating eccDNA, you give the "length of the reads" more weight than the other parameters when adding the score together to get the circle score)

Best,

Ko

@iprada
Copy link
Owner

iprada commented Nov 11, 2021

Sorry for the late reply. In a very hacky manner. So that it was helpful for some collaborators. I have therefore not explore anything about it.

best,

Inigo

@ko0000 ko0000 closed this as completed Nov 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants