Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xdcc not work for more than 4GB #977

Closed
bibiyanki opened this issue Nov 24, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

xdcc not work for more than 4GB #977

bibiyanki opened this issue Nov 24, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@bibiyanki
Copy link

hello:
i try download for more than 4gb with irssi and xdcc but the bot disconnect me

what's wrong???

@vague666
Copy link
Member

What's the filesystem you are saving the file to and are you on a 32bit OS?

@bibiyanki
Copy link
Author

i saving on home/user/ and my system are deepin 64bits (it's debian)

@vague666
Copy link
Member

home/user might be a mount point but it doesn't tell us what the filesystem is

@bibiyanki
Copy link
Author

it's zip file i try to save

@vague666
Copy link
Member

zip is the file contents, what is the filesystem(fat, ntfs, ext3, ext4 etc) you are writing to

@wilhelmy
Copy link

IIRC this is a known problem with large DCC file transfers?

@ailin-nemui
Copy link
Contributor

Closing for inactivity

@Poorchop
Copy link

I have been having this issue with files >4 GB. Although it does download most of the file, the download always fails at the last few bytes. It states the connection has been reset by the peer. So far, I have tried this on an APFS filesystem on a 64-bit OS. I can try this on btrfs at some point but I don't suspect that the filesystem is the issue.

I believe that these have been passive DCC transfers but I also don't think that's the issue. For what it's worth, irssi is not the only client that has this issue—I did try one other that also always failed at the last few bytes, but that was a different environment on an NTFS filesystem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants